Don't believe my writing

I think people writing blogs, or posting on Facebook or Reddit want to help. Their advice on optimising Google Ads comes from a genuine desire to share what's worked for them - as does mine. They don't set out to misinform.

But not all advice is good advice. In fact, following some will harm your campaigns.

I can think of four reasons why good intentions turn into bad advice...

  1. Missing context.
  2. Authority bias.
  3. It becomes popular.
  4. Survivorship bias.

1. Missing context

Nobody starts an article on, say, choosing a bidding strategy with a detailed description of the account. How many campaigns, how many keywords, what happened in the past, the goal they're optimising for etc.

Instead, they launch into what worked for them.

But, what worked in their account - their context - might be wrong for your's.

You get the picture. Advice is correct in the context it was learned in.

2. Authority bias

We humans tend to accept statements at face value if they’re made by people with authority. We don't question a doctor the way we would if some average bloke said it.

Don't feel bad about this. Even highly educated scientists have been caught by this.

In 1923, leading American zoologist Theophilus Painter declared that humans had 24 pairs of chromosomes. He made a mistake, but his influence and standing were so great, that for the next 30 years his error persisted. Scientists who counted differently thought they were mistaken and altered their conclusions. Even photos in textbooks showing 23 pairs of chromosomes were labelled as having 24.

You'll recognise an appeal to authority - and possibly bias - when you see phrases like:

3. It’s popular

We humans tend to follow the majority, even if we think they’re wrong.

In the 1950s Solomon Asch documented this by experimenting on college students, in what are now known as the Asch conformity experiments.

Groups of eight participated in a simple task. Seven of each group were actors. Number eight was the unsuspecting lab rat, the subject of the experiment.

Here's how it worked.

The actors were introduced to the subject as fellow participants.

Each group was shown a card with a line on it. They were then shown another card with three lines, labeled A, B, and C. One of the lines on the second card was exactly the same length as the first line. The other two lines were much longer and much shorter. There was no way anyone could get it wrong.

Each person in the group had to say aloud which line matched the first - A, B or C. The group was seated so that the actors spoke first and the subject spoke last.

They repeated this exercise 18 times with each subject.

On the first two rounds the actors gave the correct answer.

On the third round, all seven of the actors gave the same, but wrong, answer. The actors gave the same, but wrong, answer on 11 of the remaining 15 rounds.

The focus of the experiment was to see how many subjects would change their correct answer to match the group's wrong answer.

About three quarters of the subjects followed the crowd and gave the wrong answer at least once. Only a quarter stuck to their correct (but unpopular) answers in every round.

4. Survivorship bias

For every winner in an experiment or split test there must be a loser.

I bet you there are important lessons in articles like:

I could write one right now, based on something that didn't work called I moved the best performing search terms into an alpha campaign and the cost per click doubled. But I won't. Nobody writes these articles.

Losers aren’t sexy and they don’t make good traffic-pulling headlines.

Instead we hear only about the winners. The small number of ideas, experiments and changes that lead to an improvement.

The missing losers are as important because optimisation is as much about doing less of the wrong things as it is about doing more of the right things.

There is no universal best practice

We all want to apply best practice, but, the truth is that there is no all-embracing best practice.

What’s best practice for one account isn’t always best practice for another account.

There are some generally accepted good practices.

Nobody would argue with you if you said "always split test your ads" or "try reduce your cost per acquisition". But, even these generally accepted good practices have exceptions.

There is no optimise button

There are no secrets, no magic, no "One simple trick that gets 15% increase in CTR". Anyone who tells you otherwise is probably trying to sell something or doesn’t yet know enough about Google Ads.

But there is one universal principle: Do more of what works and less of what doesn’t.

Want higher conversion rates?

I’ve seen conversion rates double, triple and even 10X after a few quick and easy changes to the enquiry form.

Subscribe now and I'll send you a free copy of my in-depth ebook High-Converting Enquiry Forms.

You're already paying for clicks. Now turn them into conversions.

Privacy policy. Unsubscribe at any time.

RELATED ARTICLES

How do you get more leads from Google Ads when you’ve maxed out impression share?
How do you get more leads from Google Ads when you’ve maxed out impression share? Here's how we solved this problem...
Does Google rip advertisers off?
I'm not saying that everyone who's paid for Google ads has turned a profit. That's definitely not the case. But, when people lose money on Google ads its likely to be because Google Ads was a poor fit for their business, or because of the way they did Google Ads. I can't see Google risking their future to steal your advertising budget.
Don’t believe every recommendation from Google.
The optimisation score is Google’s newest way of telling you how to run your Google Ads account. Read on to see how following it blindly can hurt your business.
Don't believe my writing
I'm not trying to bamboozle you, it's just that my - and everyone else's - writing isn't always right for your circumstances. Read on to find out more...
I’m getting too many B2C leads. I want only B2B.
I’ve bumped into this problem with almost every client who sells to other businesses (B2B) not to consumers (B2C). Here are some options ...
Google showed your ads to the wrong people today.
Google showed your some of your adverts to the wrong people today. You (or someone you hire) must deal with this or your ads are going to start costing more and generating fewer leads. Here's how.
Has Google jumped the gun on mobile?
How much commercial activity happens on mobile phones? Is it enough to justify a mobile-first approach to development? Case study with mobile vs desktop AdWords generated leads across 7 industries.
I'm scared I'll break my campaign
If you don't feel confident making changes to Google Ads campaigns this might help...
How to get fast traction on a brand new AdWords campaign.
I worked out a process for getting fast results from new AdWords campaigns so I didn't have to worry as much. You're welcome to copy (and improve) my process.
Improve conversion rates by adding extra calls to action.
Need to improve your conversion rate? Here's a tested approach that takes only a few minutes.
Should you show ads to people on their phones?
It is a fact that more people use the internet on their phones than they do on computers these days. But are these glued-to-their-phone types going to buy from you?
Putting a little science into AdWords
In the past I relied on a combination of the change history in AdWords, some rough notes and my memory to keep track of my testing. It worked but it wasn't great. It became more difficult as my business grew. I started to feel like I was losing control. I couldn't answer questions about an account without having to root around in Google docs, AdWords and email. Read on to see how I fixed this.
Should you advertise on Search Partners?
We check the campaigns we manage regularly to see how much it costs to generate an enquiry on Google search versus search partners. Most of the time it costs more or less the same. Sometimes the difference is huge.
The hidden trade-offs of automated bidding
I like automated bidding. But, there are some trade offs with automated bidding that are not well documented.
Using the Search Terms Report to find negative keywords.
The Search Terms Report is a great place to find negative keywords to add to your AdWords campaign. It shows (some of) the actual words and phrases that triggered your ads.