I've been lucky enough to consult with several clients who run their own AdWords or have an in-house AdWords team.
I usually get called in because they're not getting the results they anticipated. They’d hoped for a reliable flow of new business but they're paying Google more and more for fewer leads.
I like this work but it's challenging. I’m often talking to people who are smarter than I am. They aren’t AdWords noobs and they know their industry better than I ever will. I've learned a lot from what they've done right and from what they've done wrong.
One mistake crops up all the time: Doing the wrong thing right.
There are loads of tactics - things you can do - for improving AdWords performance:
Most of the people I consult with are executing the individual tactics correctly. They're not making huge glaring mistakes.
When I ask why they chose a particular tactic I get a blank look. They learned the tactic from Brad, Perry or Larry. They read it on Search Engine Land. Or their AdWords rep told them to do it. They find it bizarre that anyone would question something that everyone knows is best practice.
Tactics don't exist in isolation.
You wield tactics in service of the campaign’s overarching goal.
A campaigns can have one of four goals:
A campaign can have different goals over it's lifetime. You might start evaluating if AdWords is a good fit. If it is, you'd move on to expanding to reach more potential customers. Some time later you'd work on making the campaign more efficient.
There is no way a campaign can reach two goals at once. The tactics that further one goal often impede the other.
For instance, if you wanted to increase the reach of your ads you might use BMM or phrase match keywords. This is good for keyword discovery but it's unlikely to reduce your CPA.
Target CPA bidding might be a good tactic for maintaining equilibrium but it's terrible for a new campaign with an evaluation goal.
Every tactic has a trade off. It'll favour one goal over others.
But what happens if you have two goals? Say reduce the cost per acquisition (efficiency) and use the savings to increase the number of clicks (expansion)?
The trick is to set up a separate campaign for each goal.
Your increase efficiency campaign might have SKAGs with exact match keywords. You might use manual or target CPA bidding. You’d tighten demographics and location.
Your expansion campaign might have the same keywords, but as BMM or phrase match and you might bid aggressively using maximise clicks. You could explore the search partners network or even the search network.
Subscribe now and learn how to optimise Google Ads campaigns for lead generation. Upcoming topics include:
Need more AdWords impressions? Here are 5 things you can do to get your ads seen by more people.
This is for you if you’re managing AdWords for efficiency - you want to reduce you cost per lead (CPA). The golden rule when managing AdWords for efficiency is to do more of what works and less of what doesn’t. The concept is simple but actually doing it is more difficult because you have to ...
Conventional wisdom says that you should split test your adverts. Good idea in theory, but there are some catches, and the biggest problem is that focussing on the AdWords nitty-gritty can distract you from more important things you can do to move the needle on sales.
I've been lucky enough to consult with several clients who run their own AdWords or have an in-house AdWords team. I usually get called in because they're not getting the results they anticipated. They’d hoped for a reliable flow of new business but they're paying Google more and more for fewer leads. One mistake crops up all the time...
Google recently changed how exact match keywords work. This is a problem. Sometimes your ads will show to people who are searching for things you don’t sell or services you don’t offer. Here's a tool that'll make adding negative keywords from the search reports much easier.
A campaign with an OK average CPA usually has at least one high CPA keyword hiding behind the average. (CPA = cost per acquisition = cost per lead.) Read on to learn how to find it and what to do about it.