Agency insights
Thoughts and lessons on client selection, burnout, pricing, and modernising legacy accounts, from someone who's run a Google Ads for years.
Published January 2025. Last updated July 2026.
The question "Does broad match work for lead generation?" comes up often. I've written about this before, but I though it time to update my thinking based on more recent experience.
Over the years, I’ve noticed a trend with new Google Ads features:
It feels like broad match keywords are somewhere between 2 and 3 now. They've become much better, but not for every campaign every time.
Let's get rid of 2 terrible reasons to use broad match before talking about when they might be a good fit.
And they really want you to. Their sales team is pushy, and the dashboard bombards you with promises and warnings:
Get more conversions at a similar or better ROI by adding broad match versions of your existing keywords.
Your campaign's reach is limited because your ads may not be showing for all the queries that are relevant to your business. Use broad match versions of your keywords
I've seen campaigns with one broad match keyword slung into a single ad group. Predictably, the results reflected the effort.
Someday, keyword selection and campaign structure might not matter much, but that day isn’t here yet.
I've found 2 cases when broad match keywords are useful:
Normally I'd start a new campaign (for an account with no history) by using exact match keywords. This makes it more likely that the ads will show in response to searches that will turn into leads. Most of the time I use the maximise clicks bidding strategy to get going.
This hasn't worked for the last 2 campaigns I launched. Although I had enough exact match keywords, the ads hardly showed.
Adding broad match keywords and switching to conversion-based bidding brought the campaigns to life.
I recently used broad match keywords to help 2 very different clients get more leads:
Adding broad match keywords to their existing campaigns did in fact increase leads by about 30%. The cost per lead and lead quality didn't change.
I was a little surprised but the data doesn't lie.
The original question was "Does broad match work for lead generation campaigns?" A better question is "When does broad match work for lead generation campaigns?"
It's been my experience that it works when you've got:
Let's get into the detail.
I'd define bullet-proof conversion tracking as when:-
The number of conversions in your account is close to the number of leads you've received. For various reasons it's almost impossible to get this exact, but if you're within 10-15% that's OK.
You're tracking leads for all contact methods you offer. On your ads that'd be call assets (click-to-call), lead form assets and messaging assets. On your site it could be form submissions, calls, WhatsApp messages, live chat or an email link. The thinking here is that no conversions get missed.
You're tracking some sort of lead quality metric. This could be:
It'd be even better if you were optimising for a down-funnel conversion instead of just form fills, calls and so on.
Conversion-based bidding strategies use conversions as feedback on their decisions. Over time, they learn which ad targeting leads to a conversion and which doesn't. The theory is that will eventually improve performance.
Click or impression-based bidding strategies ignore what happens after the ad is clicked. With broad match keywords that tends to result in you paying for lots of clicks which don't become leads.
Let me explain with an example from the immigration law firm:
When someone searches for a deportation lawyer, we show them an ad stating that we handle deportation cases. The landing page is all about deportation.
When someone searches for EB-1 visa help, we show an ad about EB-1 visas. We send them to a landing page explaining how we can help with their EB-1 application.
A fiancé visa search gets a fiancé visa ad and fiancé landing page, and so on.
We maintain relevance from the search to the ad to the landing page. At the moment the best way to do this is to group related keywords:
An account structure with keywords grouped by meaning is good because the matching process also considers:
I haven't seen broad match keywords bring in cheaper qualified leads. So, if you're looking to pay less per lead they're not the right move.
But, if you've got the budget to scale, and you're not able to spend it with your current keywords, then broad match is worth testing.
Both campaigns I spoke of earlier had a rough first week with broad match keywords. Conversion rate was down and the cost per lead was up. I actually paused the broad match keywords in one campaign because I thought I'd made an expensive mistake.
I should have expected this. Adding broad match keywords is a significant change. And, any significant change to targeting or budget causes turbulence.
I re-enabled the broad match keywords and after a few nervous days the conversion rate and CPA recovered.
The theory is that the bidding algorithm will learn what works and show your ads to potential good leads. Having a strong negative keyword list can speed this up by stopping ads from showing for searches that are obviously irrelevant.
I've seen that the likelihood of a lead turning into a sale is often related to how they contacted you. Leads who contact you without visiting your website - say by calling from a click-to-call button on the ad - turn into sales less frequently than leads who visit your website before contacting you.
This might be different in your business so being able to measure this is useful.
A common problem is when the lead calls you thinking they're calling another business. They searched for the other business by name and Google put your ad at the top of the screen. The lead clicked the first button they saw and you got (paid for) the call.
You can reduce this by:
In extreme cases you might have to disable call assets, lead form assets and messaging assets.
Thoughts and lessons on client selection, burnout, pricing, and modernising legacy accounts, from someone who's run a Google Ads for years.
Understand what happens after someone clicks your advert. Subjects include offline conversions, CRM integration, attribution, auditability and marketing instrumentation.
Articles about marketing, engineering, AI and problem solving that don't fit neatly into the other topics. These are some of the ideas and experiences that have shaped how I think.
Learn how to use Google Ads to generate profitable leads. Subjects include campaign strategy, bidding, targeting, optimisation and the challenges of running lead generation campaigns.
Things I've learned about high-converting landing pages. Subjects include copywriting, page structure, forms, trust, conversion rate optimisation and user experience.
Understand why some leads become customers while others don't. Subjects include diagnosing poor leads, qualification, filtering junk leads and improving the feedback you send to Google Ads.
What happens after a lead has been generated determines if Google Ads is profitable. Subjects include first contact, follow-up, quoting, lead nurturing and turning more enquiries into customers.